refactor(cli): Move sysinfo formatting into its own function #1323
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![ellipsis-dev[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/64358?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed everything up to 425521c in 1 minute and 30 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
55lines of code in1files - Skipped
1files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. gpt_engineer/applications/cli/main.py:243
- Draft comment:
The PR description/title mentions support for Gemini and Ollama, but no changes for these integrations are present. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%This comment is asking the PR author to update the PR description or title, which is against the rules. It does not provide a specific code suggestion or ask for a test to be written. Therefore, it should be removed.
2. gpt_engineer/applications/cli/main.py:271
- Draft comment:
The refactored sysinfo now omits package details. If package info is still desired, consider including it or updating related functions. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% The change appears intentional - the old code is commented out and the new code has a docstring explaining it returns formatted system details. The removal of package info seems to be a deliberate simplification. The comment is just pointing out something that was intentionally changed, not identifying a bug or suggesting a clear improvement. The comment could be valid if package info was an important feature that shouldn't have been removed. Maybe there are use cases that require package info for debugging. While package info could be useful, the change appears intentional and the comment doesn't make a strong case for why it needs to be kept. The comment is more of an observation than actionable feedback. Delete the comment since it's just pointing out an intentional change without making a clear case for why it should be reverted.
Workflow ID: wflow_jC0PovBvfZWpMnkj
You can customize 
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This pull request refactors the
--sysinfocommand output for better code organization and readability, following the Single Responsibility Principle.Changes Made
main()function directly into theget_system_info()function.get_system_info()function now returns a fully formatted, multi-line string, making it a self-contained utility.if sysinfo:block in themain()function is now simplified to a single, cleanprint()call.Related Issue
Closes #1194
Important
Refactors
--sysinfocommand output by moving formatting logic toget_system_info(), simplifyingmain()function.--sysinfocommand output inmain()by moving formatting logic toget_system_info().get_system_info()now returns a formatted string with system details.if sysinfo:block inmain()to a singleprint()call.get_system_info()now includes formatting logic for system information.--sysinfoby providing version data and env variables insights #1194.This description was created by
for 425521c. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.